Thursday, November 19, 2009

What Determines Caster Semenya's Sex?


Wednesday, November 18, the ethical issue was presented surrounding 18-year old South African Caster Semenya. I thought that the group did a good job creating class interaction because it is a very debatable subject. They presented a lot of good background information; however I was a little confused about some of the story. I decided, for my own personal knowledge to look up the story and try to get some of my questions answered. On behalf of Caster considering herself a female, I am going to address the terms in this blog in respect to that.


Caster Semenya has been competing in female running events for years. There had been speculation surrounding Semenya for years. However, these life-changing question/rumors were not brought to the front table until she won the 800-meter run at the World Championship in Berlin where she won the Gold Medal. After her win, the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) requested she undergo gender verification testing to prove she was a female. Reports indicate that Semenya is categorized as a hermaphrodite; having both male and female reproductive organs.


What I am still confused about is what qualifications must be met to constitute that a person is a male or a female in these specific situations? As Dr. Spencer mentioned in class, there are issues in the way that gender verification test are conducted. To start, there is a difference between your gender and your sex. “Gender refers to how an individual portrays and perceives him or herself---for example male or female. It is more of a social construct than a biological one. Sex, on the other hand, is biological, and that is the essence of the debate in this case, whether or not Semenya is of male or female sex, not gender. An individual can have male sex but female gender, and vice versa” (Tucker, 2009).



According to the Science of Sports article link above, ones ‘private parts’ do not constitute male or female either. There are varying conditions that can cause, for example, male ‘private parts’ to develop without needing the male reproductive organs. There is no better way for me to say these next parts so it is straight from the article, “even genetic testing cannot confirm male or female. In fact, it is so complex that to do proper sex determination testing, you have to take a multi-disciplinary approach, and make use of internal medicine specialists, gynecologists, psychologists, geneticists and endocrinologists” (Tucker, 2009).


Definitions of the area of study of the above:
· Doctors of internal medicine treat the entire person, not only internal organs. These doctors are also called internist or general internist. http://medvotech.nurseuniverse.com/Medical-Vocational-Schools/3418.html
· A gynecologist is a physician who has a successfully completed specialized education and training in the health of the female reproductive system, including the diagnosis and treatment of disorders and diseases. http://www.womenshealthchannel.com/obgyn.shtml
· Psychologists study the physical, cognitive, emotional, and social aspects of behavior, and provide mental health care in hospitals, clinics, schools, and private practices. http://www.mentalhealthchannel.net/psychologist.shtml
· A geneticist is a scientist who studies genetics, the science of heredity and variation of organisms. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneticists
· Endocrinologists are trained to diagnose and treat hormone imbalances and problems by helping to restore the normal balance of hormones in your system. http://www.hormone.org/public/endocrinologist.cfm


Even after reading all of the information and educating myself on the terminology, I am still not sure of what the IAAF will rule on her case. I do feel that this nightmare of a situation could have been taking care of ahead of time, before all the rumors began. If there were questions early on, which reports account for, then testing should have been conducted at that time. Not after she won the race and then humiliate her with accusations and chance that her Gold Medal will be taken away. As for the question of whether she should be allowed to run with females, my stance is yes. Until clear, comprehensive and universal testing can be determined, then it is unfair to not allow her to run. By science a hermaphrodite is both and neither. So if Caster is considered both and neither, how could anyone make a determination as to whom should she run with?

"I find sometimes it's easy to be myself sometimes I find it's better to be somebody else"
[davematthewsband : so much to say]

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Cheerleading; Don't Think You're Safe Just Because You're on the Sidelines

Recent reports have indicated that it’s not the contact sports of Basketball and Soccer that we should be worried about when it comes to injuries; it’s Cheerleading. I found an interesting report on Fox News’ website and their broadcast show about Cheerleading and its dangers for high school girls and college women. According to the 26th annual report released by the National Center for Catastrophic Sports Injury Research, Cheerleading is the most dangerous sport for women.

Cheerleading accounts for 2/3 of all catastrophic injuries (severe or fatal injuries) in high school and college females. The report released from the NCCSIR totaled 103 fatal, disabling, or serious injuries among female high school athletes. Of that 103, 67 occurred in Cheerleading. The report indicated that the next closest number was 9 in Gymnastics and 7 in Track.

Dr. Jake Deutsch, Doctor of Emergency Medicine from Hackensack University Medical Center, attributes the high numbers of injuries to how the sport has evolved. There are much more advanced, gymnastic-type stunts. Since Cheerleading is not recognized as a sport, the safety standards have not been updated as the sport advances. Deutsch remarks that the safety techniques are not regulated and more often than not Coaches or Advisors of the Cheer Squads are not certified.



The percentages for catastrophic injuries for girls in high school were 65% and college women were 67% at the time the report was released. These numbers, for an athletic display not even considered a sport, are dangerously high. Before hearing about the report, I didn’t think anything more than a sprain or strain was to worry about in Cheerleading. This could have been because where I went to high school our girls were not able to do any stunts or pyramids for insurance reasons. They were not covered in the event that some injury would happen so they were banned from fly-stunts. In a few other studies that are out now, some states are requiring the Coaches or Advisors to take certification classes and safety courses. I think that is the first step to having more success in Cheerleading. I now have a new respect for Cheerleaders and what they do.


"Rolling Stone Gathers No Moss, But Leave a Trail of Busted Stuff"
[DMB][Busted Stuff]





Marcus Jordan; Special Treatment Ethics


Marcus Jordan, son of Michael Jordan, has caused quite a debate in the news this past month. Marcus Jordan is in his freshman year at the University of Central Florida where he plays basketball. Going into the agreement to play there, Marcus was promised that he would be allowed to wear his shoe of choice, White Nike Air Jordan’s; despite the fact that UCF has an exclusive contract with Adidas. Reports indicate that this promise was made in the presence of UCF officials and Adidas regional representatives. However, corporate officials for Adidas overturned the promise on the company’s end of the deal. Because Marcus was allowed by UCF to wear his father’s brand of shoes because of previous terms of agreement, UCF lost their 6 year, $3 million contract with Adidas.

Is this a question of special treatment and privileges or does this fall into the category where a precedent was already set? Before I did so research, I thought it was a cut and dry typical case of a famous athlete’s child receiving special treatment because of their last name. Everything fits the mold for that situation. But, at UCF, athletic director Keith Tribble defended Jordan’s decision to wear their competitors brand because a former football play for UCF was allowed to a different brand because of the way the shoe fit. Precedent was set when UCF and Adidas allowed that situation to happen.

I am not familiar with all the terms and conditions placed on UCF’s contract with Adidas, but what has been reported in the news seems to me that the blame is mostly on UCF for any financial losses or breach of contracts. Is the case a little different because Marcus Jordan is who he is. Think about it they are not going to go back on a promise they made to Michael Jordan’s son, and that I think is the only shady part of this situation. It is hard for people who have to make the judgment calls to only focus on the facts, and not weigh in the hype surrounding the situation. Would UCF go back on a promise made to a ‘no name’ athlete to save financial burdens?




"The Money is Clean when They Scrub it Good"
[DMB][Joyride]